Confronto: consumo combinato (NEDC) Skoda Rapid (1. Generation 2012 - 2017) vs. concorrenti

Rapid 1. Generation 2012
1.Generation (1. Facelift) 2017

Indice dei contenuti:

Skoda Rapid - Qual è il consumo combinato (nedc) dei diversi motori?

Motori di Skoda Rapid

(Consumo combinato (NEDC))
Motori di Skoda Rapid
MotoreConsumo combinato (NEDC)
1.4 TDI Green tec Active 66 kW3.4 l/100km
1.4 TDI Green tec Active DSG 66 kW3.6 l/100km
1.6 TDI Green tec Active 85 kW4.1 l/100km
Spaceback 1.6 TDI Active 66 kW4.4 l/100km
1.6 TDI Active 77 kW4.4 l/100km
Spaceback 1.6 TDI Ambition DSG 66 kW4.5 l/100km
1.2 TSI Green tec Active 66 kW4.6 l/100km
1.2 TSI Green tec Active DSG 66 kW4.6 l/100km
1.4 TSI Green tec Ambition DSG 92 kW4.7 l/100km
1.2 TSI Green tec Active 81 kW4.8 l/100km
1.2 TSI Active 63 kW5.1 l/100km
1.2 TSI Active 77 kW5.4 l/100km
1.2 Active 55 kW5.8 l/100km
1.4 TSI Ambition DSG 90 kW5.8 l/100km
1. 1.4 TDI Green tec Active 66 kW 3.4 l/100km
2. 1.4 TDI Green tec Active DSG 66 kW 3.6 l/100km
3. 1.6 TDI Green tec Active 85 kW 4.1 l/100km
4. Spaceback 1.6 TDI Active 66 kW 4.4 l/100km
5. 1.6 TDI Active 77 kW 4.4 l/100km
6. Spaceback 1.6 TDI Ambition DSG 66 kW 4.5 l/100km
7. 1.2 TSI Green tec Active 66 kW 4.6 l/100km
8. 1.2 TSI Green tec Active DSG 66 kW 4.6 l/100km
9. 1.4 TSI Green tec Ambition DSG 92 kW 4.7 l/100km
10. 1.2 TSI Green tec Active 81 kW 4.8 l/100km
11. 1.2 TSI Active 63 kW 5.1 l/100km
12. 1.2 TSI Active 77 kW 5.4 l/100km
13. 1.2 Active 55 kW 5.8 l/100km
14. 1.4 TSI Ambition DSG 90 kW 5.8 l/100km

Varianti

Varianti di Skoda Rapid: Rapid Limousine vs. Rapid Spaceback

(Consumo combinato (NEDC))
Consumo combinato (NEDC): Varianti di Skoda Rapid
Nome varianteConsumo combinato (NEDC)
Rapid Limousine5.8 l/100km
Rapid Spaceback5.1 l/100km
1. Rapid Limousine 5.8 l/100km
2. Rapid Spaceback 5.1 l/100km

Il consumo combinato (nedc) rispetto ad altri modelli Skoda

Skoda Rapid vs altre auto attuali della Skoda

(Consumo combinato (NEDC))
Consumo combinato (NEDC): Rapid vs. altri modelli della Skoda
Nome varianteConsumo combinato (NEDC)
Rapid Limousine 1.4 TDI Clever DSG 66 kW4.5 l/100km
Citigo 1.0 Green tec Active ASG 55 kW4.5 l/100km
Rapid Spaceback 1.4 TDI Clever DSG 66 kW4.5 l/100km
Karoq 2.0 TDI SCR Drive 125 4x4 DSG 140 kW5.2 l/100km
Roomster Scout 1.2 TSI Style 77 kW5.7 l/100km
Fabia RS DSG 132 kW5.7 l/100km
Superb Limousine Combi 1.6 TDI Green tec Ambition 77 kW5.9 l/100km
Superb Combi Combi 1.6 TDI Green tec Ambition 77 kW6.1 l/100km
Kodiaq RS TDI 4x4 DSG 176 kW6.1 l/100km
Roomster 1.2 TSI Style 77 kW6.2 l/100km
Praktik 1.6 TDI 66 kW6.2 l/100km
Yeti 2.0 TDI Ambition 4x4 125 kW6.4 l/100km
Kodiaq Scout RS TDI 4x4 DSG 176 kW6.9 l/100km
Octavia Combi 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW7.0 l/100km
Octavia Limousine 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW7.0 l/100km
Octavia RS Limousine 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW7.5 l/100km
Octavia RS Combi 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW7.5 l/100km
Octavia Scout 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW7.8 l/100km
1. Rapid Limousine 1.4 TDI Clever DSG 66 kW 4.5 l/100km
2. Citigo 1.0 Green tec Active ASG 55 kW 4.5 l/100km
3. Rapid Spaceback 1.4 TDI Clever DSG 66 kW 4.5 l/100km
4. Karoq 2.0 TDI SCR Drive 125 4x4 DSG 140 kW 5.2 l/100km
5. Roomster Scout 1.2 TSI Style 77 kW 5.7 l/100km
6. Fabia RS DSG 132 kW 5.7 l/100km
7. Superb Limousine Combi 1.6 TDI Green tec Ambition 77 kW 5.9 l/100km
8. Superb Combi Combi 1.6 TDI Green tec Ambition 77 kW 6.1 l/100km
9. Kodiaq RS TDI 4x4 DSG 176 kW 6.1 l/100km
10. Roomster 1.2 TSI Style 77 kW 6.2 l/100km
11. Praktik 1.6 TDI 66 kW 6.2 l/100km
12. Yeti 2.0 TDI Ambition 4x4 125 kW 6.4 l/100km
13. Kodiaq Scout RS TDI 4x4 DSG 176 kW 6.9 l/100km
14. Octavia Combi 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW 7.0 l/100km
15. Octavia Limousine 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW 7.0 l/100km
16. Octavia RS Limousine 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW 7.5 l/100km
17. Octavia RS Combi 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW 7.5 l/100km
18. Octavia Scout 1.4 16V Ambition 59 kW 7.8 l/100km

Come si confronta il consumo combinato (nedc) del Skoda Rapid con i suoi concorrenti più vicini?

Skoda Rapid vs. auto simili

(Consumo combinato (NEDC))
Consumo combinato (NEDC): Skoda Rapid vs. auto simili
Modello autoConsumo combinato (NEDC)
Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 75 20194.1 l/100km
Citroen C3 PureTech 83 Stop&Start 20204.2 l/100km
VW up! 1.0 20164.4 l/100km
Nissan Micra 1.0 20174.6 l/100km
Fiat 500 1.2 8V 20154.9 l/100km
Renault Clio SCe 65 20194.9 l/100km
Suzuki SX4 S-Cross 1.0 Boosterjet 20165.0 l/100km
SEAT Ateca 1.0 TSI Ecomotive 20165.2 l/100km
KIA Stonic 1.2 20175.2 l/100km
VW Touran 1.2 TSI BMT 20155.5 l/100km
Renault Scénic ENERGY TCe 115 20165.8 l/100km
Skoda Rapid 1.2 20125.8 l/100km
Abarth 595 20166.0 l/100km
Ford S-MAX 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp 20156.5 l/100km
Fiat Fiorino Kombi 1.4 8V 20166.9 l/100km
Mazda MX-5 SKYACTIV-G 160 20156.9 l/100km
1. Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 75 2019 4.1 l/100km
2. Citroen C3 PureTech 83 Stop&Start 2020 4.2 l/100km
3. VW up! 1.0 2016 4.4 l/100km
4. Nissan Micra 1.0 2017 4.6 l/100km
5. Fiat 500 1.2 8V 2015 4.9 l/100km
6. Renault Clio SCe 65 2019 4.9 l/100km
7. Suzuki SX4 S-Cross 1.0 Boosterjet 2016 5.0 l/100km
8. SEAT Ateca 1.0 TSI Ecomotive 2016 5.2 l/100km
9. KIA Stonic 1.2 2017 5.2 l/100km
10. VW Touran 1.2 TSI BMT 2015 5.5 l/100km
11. Renault Scénic ENERGY TCe 115 2016 5.8 l/100km
12. Skoda Rapid 1.2 2012 5.8 l/100km
13. Abarth 595 2016 6.0 l/100km
14. Ford S-MAX 1.5 EcoBoost Start/Stopp 2015 6.5 l/100km
15. Fiat Fiorino Kombi 1.4 8V 2016 6.9 l/100km
16. Mazda MX-5 SKYACTIV-G 160 2015 6.9 l/100km

Auto simili

Mazda 6
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
-100% (0.0 l/100km)


Confronta
Skoda Superb
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
-100% (0.0 l/100km)


Confronta
VW Passat
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
-100% (0.0 l/100km)


Confronta
SEAT Ateca
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
-10% (5.2 l/100km)


Confronta
Suzuki SX4
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
-14% (5.0 l/100km)


Confronta
Fiat Fiorino/Qubo
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
+19% (6.9 l/100km)


Confronta
Fiat 500
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
-16% (4.9 l/100km)


Confronta
VW up!
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
-24% (4.4 l/100km)


Confronta
Abarth 500/595/695
Consumo combinato (NEDC):
+3% (6.0 l/100km)


Confronta

Compare with ...

TOPlist